|
 |
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:14:08 +0200, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msn com> wrote:
>
> who was offered what? was everyone competing for top rewards? i don't
> get it.
The test was performed several times, each time with different levels of
reward offered. The participants competing for big rewards did worse than
those competing for small (or no) rewards.
Admittedly, he does kind of confuse things in that video, especially with
the drawings. Neeum Zawan linked to a better video, one that even has a
citation for the experiment:
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_pink_on_motivation.html
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
