|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
And lo on Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:32:37 +0100, Chambers
<ben### [at] pacificwebguy com> did spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> And lo on Sat, 02 Aug 2008 05:11:51 +0100, Chambers
>> <ben### [at] pacificwebguy com> did spake, saying:
>>> It was the sheer idiocy of the character. It's the same reason I
>>> don't like characters like Barney the Dinosaur, or movies like Dumb
>>> and Dumber.
>> But Barney's aimed at the young
>
> Not a valid excuse. I've seen plenty of programming aimed at the young
> that isn't idiotic in the slightest.
Would you deprive the idiot demographic?
>> and Dumb and Dumber is intentionally idiotic,
>
> Oh, so they were *trying* to be dumb... that really makes them less
> dumb, doesn't it?
>
> Like I said, it's the sheer idiocy of it. I don't care if they were
> trying to be that way or not; actually, it's worse, because rather than
> being something they can't avoid, they're intentionally doing something
> that I don't like.
Then don't watch it. With a title like Dumb and Dumber are you expecting
to see a biography of Proust. It's the idiotic characters that populate an
otherwise non-idiotic show that you should be railing against, in this
context Jar Jar serves no purpose that couldn't have been handed off to a
less idiotic character.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |