On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:23:49 +0200, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> I saw a bit of a note describing how to use an "assert" and a "check"  
> call in some C++.  "Assert" would exit the program if it failed, and  
> "check" would let the program continue after logging in order to look  
> for more failures.
>
> But the invocation was along the lines of
>
> assert(x < 10) <<
>     "The value x is " << x << " but that's too small";
>
> The only way I can see this working is if assert returns either a  
> subclass with operator<< defined to do nothing, or with operator<<  
> defined to log something. In the latter case, the destructor would exit  
> the program?  Would that work?

I do not see why it would not.



-- 
FE

Post a reply to this message