|
|
And lo on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:43:10 +0100, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> did
spake, saying:
> Phil Cook <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>> So presumably you'd want to widen this to including firefighters,
>> ambulance drivers, doctors, nurses etc.
>
> No, because they don't patrol the streets while on duty.
>
> You are still slipperysloping.
Um yes you keep trying to suggest that this train of argument is
universally flawed without providing any evidence. Slipperysloping is a
reality - "Hey you're permitting X why aren't you permitting Y which is
just like X sort of"
>> An ambulance driver is on their
>> way back from a call stops off in a no-parking zone to grab a meal
>> because
>> a) he needs to keep an eye on the vehicle and b) needs to be able to
>> respond to an emergency.
>
> Ambulance drivers eat at the hospital (or whichever place they are when
> not on a call). They are not even supposed to eat while on a call.
So why don't the police do the same thing?
>> > Basically you are saying that in a situation where doing both things
>> > at the same time is not possible by the strict letter of the law, for
>> > example because there are no available parking slots nearby, the
>> police
>> > officer must sacrifice one duty for the other.
>
>> Or to put it another way he has to do what everyone else has to do.
>
> Everyone else don't have the same duties as police officers. A police
> officer has more responsibility, thus it's only logical to make him
> fulfilling this responsibility as easy as possible.
Nope it's the Spiderman quote - a police officer is given more powers and
thus has a greater responsibilty not to abuse them. IOW the rules should
be stricter when they are not directly in pursuit of those duties.
Mueen's got the right idea let a judge determine whether any such illegal
acts have been commited in the pursuit of a police officer's duty... oh
wait they did in this case and fined him.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|