And lo on Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:25:46 +0100, Mike Raiford  
<mra### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:

> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> Sad to say I see nothing wrong in your wife's attitude. Now I can make  
>> an argument that the 'correct' position may also, depending on design,  
>> be 180° away from you and thus right-side-up to your opposite number...  
>> sigh yes I am the type of person who wants to straighten frames in  
>> receptions, it just itches to see them like that... okay, okay I also  
>> tidy up the magazines too; happy now?
>
> Gaah!
>
> Man, I thought *I* was type-a for organizing my son's chain thingy toy  
> in hue order.

Why wouldn't it be hue-order to start with? If it's what I think it is (or  
close to  it) I'm trying to imagine one that isn't and urgh no that's just  
wrong.

> But the plates are another matter. I'm sitting down for a quick lunch,  
> maybe a sandwich and chips (crisps for you British folk) on a plate. I'm  
> not going to care what direction the art points.
>
> I've threatened to replace the plates with omnidirectional ones.

Heh I already have ones with a symmetrical pattern... the mats they sit on  
however are directional :-)

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message