|
|
And lo on Wed, 21 May 2008 10:30:14 +0100, scott <sco### [at] scottcom> did
spake, saying:
>>>> Well, even if you try to be metric, the Americans have a different
>>>> idea about what constitutes a "billion"...
>>>
>>> Dude, you're so out of date, were you even born when the UK officially
>>> abandoned the idea that a million million is a billion?
>>
>> It's new to me that it was *ever* abandoned. (Why would you do such a
>> thing?)
>
> To avoid confusion?
With whom? Oh wait silly question.
> IIRC back in the 80s (or maybe even earlier)
'74 according to Wikipedia.
> the UK officially stopped using "billion" to mean 1e12, and since then
> it has always meant 1e9. Did you really think all those figures in the
> financial part of the paper that say $6bn mean $6000000000000 and not
> $6000000000?
Still amusing that a bi(mi)llion is officially a thousand million,
linguists of the future are going to have so much fun with this.
Perhaps we should just drop the names and use £6e9 or £3e12 for anything
over a million?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|