|
 |
And lo On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:52:29 -0000, Nicolas Alvarez
<nic### [at] gmail com> did spake thusly:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> (And that of course is the other undesirable thing about digital TV.
>> There used to be, like, 5 channels, 4 of them containing high quality
>> programming. Now there's 500 channels and they're *all* showing utter
>> crap that nobody would ever want to watch...)
>
> That has nothing to do with digital TV. It's just the drop of quality
> programming happened at the same time. Correlation != causation.
'Digital television is great it will allow many more channels to be
broadcast within the same frequency range' = money to be split between
four channels rather than just the one = the government scrabbling to get
more broadcasters to fill all these channels = really cheap television.
Oo four Shopping Channels, how did I ever cope before "Russia Today", and
where would I lose money if not for "SuperCasino" or "The Big Deal"?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
