|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
And lo On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:39:59 -0000, scott <sco### [at] scott com> did
spake thusly:
>> Ah but if you accept that we're simply rationalising actions already
>> determined by our unconscious the chemical reactions that make you want
>> to rob the store were countered/blocked by chemical reactions that
>> stopped you. In the case of those who did rob the store said
>> counter-reactions simply weren't strong enough and whose fault is that?
>
> It doesn't matter so much whose fault it is, just that something should
> be done to ensure that in the future that person has strong enough
> counter reactions to stop them robbing the store. Making that person
> pay some money or sit in jail for a while can have that effect.
But you're punishing them for something that's not their fault ;-)
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |