|
 |
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:02:28 +0100, waggy <hon### [at] handbasket org> wrote:
>
> I also think the power two is the most interesting, and have been
> exploring it the last few days. I attached a 10-iteration "top" view,
> which looks more like what you posted than Mr. White's. I don't know
> why that is.
It could be that we are looking at it from a different direction. The
power 2 Mandelbulb seems to have much less symmetry than is seen with the
higher powers.
> My first thought was that voxel discretization doesn't capture the
> fine detail, but it appears yours begins to do so.
Mine is a "true" isosurface, but the Mandelbulb function is a difficult
one for the isosurface code to handle, so there are trade-offs between
performance and accuracy.
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
