|
|
And lo on Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:26:22 -0000, scott <sco### [at] laptopcom> did
spake, saying:
>> As Sabrina says some of them are over-17, but for the under's I'll be
>> betting on a family gun or some such. Was it Michael Moore who pointed
>> out that the majority of guns 'on the streets' in America were stolen
>> from those who purchased them legally.
>
> I heard a lot of Americans say that they own (and sometimes carry) a gun
> to protect themselves. But in reality, when an attacker starts
> shooting, how many members of the public are really going to get out
> their gun and try to battle with the attacker?
I think the 'protect' bit refers more to home defence I'm sure most States
require a permit to carry a concealed weapon, which implies that carrying
a non-concealed weapon is hunky-dory.
> And do they propose that children carry guns too to protect themselves?
Start 'em young. Everyone knows that the best thing for a high-pressure,
clique-ridden situation that is found in a school is to add weapons to the
mix.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|