And lo on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:51:38 -0000, Jim Henderson  
<nos### [at] nospamcom> did spake, saying:

> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:32:57 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> And lo on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:26:21 -0000, Nicolas Alvarez
>> <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> did spake, saying:
>>

>>>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That was a half-joke.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that <sarcasm> is not considered a valid tag by W3C standards,
>>>>> yet people use it on newsgroups :)
>>>>  How about <div id="sarcasm"> ? :-)
>>>
>>> Then you can't have multiple sarcasms per post, since IDs must be
>>> unique. 'class' may work though :)
>>
>> Sarcasm can't be used with class, you must upgrade to wit instead.
>
> Nice one, Phil. :-)

TY

"You know sarcasm is the lowest form of wit"
"At least it shows I have some form of wit"

"Sarcasm is the last refuge of the incompetent"
"And tired platitudes their first"

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message