|
 |
And lo on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:08:36 -0000, Gilles Tran
<gil### [at] agroparistech fr> did spake, saying:
>
> de
> news: op.t5ud7znsc3xi7v@news.povray.org...
>> I'm trying to think of the term used to describe a paticular fallacy -
>>
>> 'If you do it for X (greater) you have to do it for Y (lesser)'
>>
>
> Sounds a little like Reductio ad absurdum
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
That sounds more like it, thanks.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
