|
|
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:07:13 +0100, nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Fredrik Eriksson" <noo### [at] nowherecom> wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:39:05 +0100, nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom>
>> wrote:
>> > really?! It's possible to have a Windows file with actually no
>> > extension? I don't mean hiding the extension from view, but
>> > actually having none...
>>
>> Of course it is. What made you think otherwise?
>
> old times? I remember at some point Windows didn't let it be done.
At what point was that? Even MS-DOS let you have extensionless files.
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|