|
|
And lo on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:49:42 -0000, Chambers
<ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> did spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> And lo on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:01:29 -0000, Tim Cook
>>> Why don't they make submarines, F-15s, heck, even trains large enough
>>> that you can just waltz around freely? Space is at a premium in just
>>> about any vehicle. You use as little as possible.
>> No, it's down to weight and manoeuvrability neither of which apply to
>> a spacecraft. In terms of fiction take a look at the Warhammer 40k ships
>> http://www.wargames.co.uk/Pending/Archive/May03/odds&sods/bfgcover.jpg
>
> Air resistance might not apply, but manueverability does. Applying a
> force to different parts of the ship will stress different sections in
> different ways. That's a whole lot of differences there!
Yes except what might be deemed 'travel' ships shouldn't be engaged in
high stress producing maneuvers; those are reserved for the
fighters/escorts/shuttles, which I agree need to be smaller.
> Besides which, weight is out, but mass is in. So smaller is still
> better.
No because a) although you need more oomph to get the ship moving/stopping
that's a one-off cost and b) volume doesn't directly equal mass; if I
increase the height of a room the only mass increase is in the walls and
'air'.
Create a 7 unit cubic room with walls massing 1kg per square unit (all the
same thickness). You're pumping it full of a gas that masses 0.1kg per
cubic unit. So the mass of the initial room is 328.3kg. Now increase the
height of the room by 1 unit and you get 361.2kg a ~10% increase in mass
for a ~14% gain in volume. Make it all 8*8*8 and you get a ~49% volume
increase for a ~32% mass increase.
Not that I'm saying 'Hey why not make all the rooms 300ft square' at some
point you hit overkill, what I am saying is make the rooms the size they
need to be for everyone to use them comfortably. So no ducking through
doors or having a shared up/down ladder. It serves no purpose other then
being able to use those surplus navy submarine doors.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|