And lo on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:40:17 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did  
spake, saying:

> Phil Cook wrote:
>> And lo on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:54:59 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull>  
>> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> OK, let's see the MathML for the following expression:
>>>
>>> 
S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)I)))(S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)I))))
 
>>> Care to tell me where one subexpression ends and the next one begins?  
>>> ;-)
>>  Just for fun with spans
>
> Looks good! (Although possibly the spacing is a little *too* generous.)

Well it's allowing for 11 levels with enough of a gap so that lines don't  
blend, but it's adjustable.

> Certainly a lot easier to find subexpressions than in the raw text  
> above. Just a pitty it takes so many miles of CSS...

Well the CSS is fixed so just dump it into a separate file and all you'll  
have is the spans

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message