And lo on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:36:17 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did  
spake, saying:

> Phil Cook wrote:
>> And lo on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:21:42 -0000, Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull>  
>> did spake, saying:
>>
<snip>

>>  I'm sure you can get one of the languages you use to do something like  
>> that.
>
> Well, that'll work... but surely there's some W3C compliant way of doing  
> this transparently without such low-level hacks?

This is a W3C compliant way - HTML+CSS, what's not compliant about it? The  
only thing you can moan about is the use of style in a strict.

> (I still don't understand why having a large box inside doesn't cause  
> the containing box to enlarge itself...)

It does if you use a block rather then an inline element.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message