|
|
And lo on Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:37:33 -0000, Francois Labreque
<fla### [at] sympaticoca> did spake, saying:
>> And lo on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:46:50 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull>
>> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> Phil Cook wrote:
>>>> And lo on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:11:41 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull>
>>>> did spake, saying:
>>>>
>>>> But at a 4x heightened efficiency no doubt.
>>>
>>> Well, it's Cisco, so at least you can geniunely say it's the best
>>> product on the market. (Unlike the Dell thing...) It's expensive, but
>>> at least you can say you're getting build quality.
>> It is kind of like buying gold-filigreed oars carved from the finest
>> woods by master craftsman in order to paddle your hide coracle.
>>
>
> Having worked with many brands of switches, Cisco gear clearly
> outperforms the others when it comes to troubleshooting. This might
> have factored in. Of course, maybe the guys in the US simply went for
> the "Oooh Shiney!" ads.
Odds-on for 'Shiny'.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|