|
|
And lo on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:40:59 -0000, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
did spake, saying:
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> In article <473dd775@news.povray.org>, war### [at] tagpovrayorg says...
>>> Phil Cook <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>>> No not really, feel free to doubt it. if you do then you must have a
>>>> reason to do so, which implies you have another theory
>>> Once again, that is completely flawed logic.
>>>
>>> There's no law in science which says that you must have an
>>> alternative
>>> theory in order to reasonably doubt an existing theory.
>>>
>> Quite true. He got that much wrong.
>
> Well, he was right in the sense that if you doubt the theory is true
> without any reason to do so, then you're behaving irrationally. Not
> necessarily a bad thing, but not exactly scientific.
Well even an irrational reason is a reason, but what I did say was that it
implies you have another theory not that you must have one.
>> If they stopped with, "I don't know, lets find an answer.", no one
>> would have a problem with them, at least with respect to their position
>> on science.
>
> I think if they asserted their views and actually had a willingness to
> change their mind based on reality, people wouldn't ridicule nearly as
> much. It isn't the creationism being ridiculed. It's the pigheaded
> refusal to evaluate whether it might be wrong, even in the middle of a
> scientific debate.
>
> I honestly think creationists would get far less ridicule if they just
> said "our opinions differ, and I can't convince you, and you can't
> convince me, so let's just each do our own thing." But they often try to
> argue you into believing it for some reason.
Which was my second point regarding conflicting systems. You can't use an
evidence-based structure to debate a faith-based one it's like taking a
speedometer out of a car and debating over why it won't weigh potatoes.
>> Imho, if it wasn't given absurd levels of respect,
>
> Only some of it. Try taking off every thursday from work on the grounds
> that you need to go worship Thor, and see how much slack you get from
> your boss.
Become an atheist and declare every day to be special :-P
> And apparently Australia now has more write-in Jedi Knights on the
> census than many of the other religions. Yet, oddly enough, Australia is
> reluctant to recognise it as an official religion. Wonder why....
Too much broken grammar it would result in yes?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|