|
 |
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 07:32:14 -0500, "Greg M. Johnson" <gregj:-)565### [at] aol com>
wrote:
> a page with 320x240's and links to 800x600 jpg
note: with such long page order can influence impression
~30 pictures can fit into
o) 6 x 5 table with image size 128 x 96
o) 8 x 4 table with image size 80 x 60
This way it can fulfill one screen, and can be easy to navigate
> a voting page with 32x24's and links to 800x600 jpg
fast look to irtc sizes at http://www.irtc.org/stills/2002-02-28/view.html
and my suggestion is to double or triple this 32x24 or use the same table as
above
> It might have already been
> done, but the baby wouldn't go to bed properly last night....
I had the same problem at night. My daughter broke my dream at 2 at night
singing until 4 :-(
> i) I really don't want to.
That's your choose, it was only suggestion. I proposed it becouse it is common
problem that in large set of different jpgs there can be one with artefacts.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
