On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:44:39 +0200, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

>On 29-Sep-08 10:29, Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:03:32 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> 
>>> The fun part - apparently - is getting FractInt to actually run any 
>>> more. Being an old MS-DOS program that manually frobnicates the video 
>>> hardware in advanced ways, it doesn't tend to run very happily under 
>>> Windoze. (Indeed, you might have more luck with the Linux port...)
>> 
>> Winfract?
>
>For some reason I read that as "Winfarct?". 

Is it my accent? ;)

>That would even have made 
>sense as a description of the what happens when you manipulate the video 
>directly under windoze.

Too true :)
And Winfract does not do colour cycling :(
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message