|
 |
On 4 May 2004 12:48:20 -0400, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256 com> wrote:
> > is that first step: tessellating isosurfaces reliably is hard, and many
> > of the algorithms are tied up in patents.
>
> Oh, f*ck
Please, do not use that word here, even with "*". Thanks in advance.
> USA
Idea of patents is not limited to USA. http://www.uprp.pl/
> if this pattent madness continues
What's wrong in patenting intelectual property in general ?
If somebody has discovered something and he spend years for studying math to
achive it, why he can't get reward for those years of studying?
I understand that's inconvenient from our point of view, but also I understand
purpose of the patents.
> soon all programs will be
> in normal "non-usa" version, and in version without half of features.
So, you like globalisation, I like diversity ;-)
Follow-up set.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
