|
 |
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:42:54 +0200, Christian Parpart <cpa### [at] surakware net>
wrote:
> Well, there's a wonderfull water example using POV-Ray 3.5 wich makes
> extensive use of that hat (^) operator.
And this is bug you are reffering to ? Why you not ask author of this example
to correct this bug ? He probably know that his example is not 3.5 compatible.
> Replacing it by its pow function make the source bigger and (perhaps) not
> more readable.
Don't ask for not readable languages, please :-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
