On Thu, 11 May 2000 10:37:59 +0200, "Philippe Debar"
<phi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

>"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] usanet> wrote in message
>news:ackjhsorirt2na2ak719s4msactcc3q2vf@4ax.com...
>> To avoid misunderstandings, please refer to RFC2119 located at
>> ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2119.txt for the standardised meanings
>> of: "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
>> "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL".
>
>I just never imagined there were RFC-standardised meanings. Kind of scary.

Only for documents which explicitly state that. It helps avoid
misunderstandings.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message