On 29 Jun 2008 09:01:10 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:

>Stephen <mcavoysAT@aoldotcom> wrote:
>> On 29 Jun 2008 06:51:49 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>
>> >Stephen <mcavoysAT@aoldotcom> wrote:
>> >> If Andrew's posts annoy you just
>> >> blacklist him then you won't be irritated by his musings.
>> >
>> >  Why are there only extremes? Everywhere there are and can only be
>> >extremes. Someone must either like 100% of everything someone else does,
>> >or he has to hate 100% of it. There are no other possibilities.
>> >
>> What are you talking about, what extremes? Putting someone on a
>> blacklist in a newsgroup only means, you won't see his posts not that
>> he won't be able to post.
>
>  I wasn't implying anything else. Read again.

You weren't implying anything else than what? 
What is extreme about setting up your newsreader so that you don't see
a person's posts, if that is what you meant? Although I'll tell you
what I think is extreme and that is, beating someone around the head,
metaphorically speaking, until he stops posting content you personally
don't like. If you don't like it then don't read it.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message