On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 21:56:14 -0400, Francois Labreque wrote:
> I know it's Waaaaaay too late for inclusion in 3.5, but this might be
> food for thought for 4.0 (or 3.6)
> 
> Instead of having the camera right:up vector ratio default to 4:3 and
> providing image_height and image_width built-in variables so that we can
> adjust the value of the vectors to match the image aspect ratio, why not
> have it default to image_width:image_heigth?

What stands against writing "right <image_width/image_height, 0, 0>"
in your camera definition?

Johannes

-- 
E-Mail: bre### [at] 5slorg     www: http://spock.5sl.org/~bretscher
pgp fingerprint = 441A 3B97 811D EC61 DC0A  474B 17C4 EB7F 9BD1 BEAC

God, Root, what is difference?
   Illiad

Post a reply to this message