On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:13:48 -0600, "somebody" <x### [at] ycom> wrote:

>
>"andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
>news:4A2### [at] hotmailcom...
>> On 6-6-2009 23:46, Stephen wrote:
>> > On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:06:18 +0200, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom>
>wrote:
>
>> >> I always say that a discussion between two
>> >
>> > If Warp had not posted, there would have been at least 4 posts less.
>
>> But Warp's post was a metapost (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaPost,
>> thanks Don for that) or an attempt to hijack a thread that was about
>> something he does not want anybody to discuss.
>
>Would I be correct in suggesting that yours is than a meta-metapost?
>

Thus making yours a meta^3post whereas this is not a meta^4post as it is on the
same subject. I see it all now. There is a Grand Creator.

I'm currently reading The Science of Discworld III - Darwin's Watch.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message