Wasn't it Ron Parker who wrote:

>Also, job000188 has been fixed in the next beta, but I didn't see
>that one in your list, so it never existed. :)

None of the bugs reported on this newsgroup seem to have ever been
identified as job000188. Sometimes job numbers get implemented without
ever being associated with a reported bug.

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure

Post a reply to this message