|
|
In article <3a5b397b@news.povray.org>, "Lance Birch" <-> wrote:
>example), the major drawback for most people is that in making two images
>you halve your development time on each image, so to speak.
Right. This has figured into the voting for me, and from the comments it
appears a few others as well. If you enter two images, and they suffer
from problems that could have been fixed by throwing more time at the
image, we already know you *had* the time. If (for example) one of them
isn't anti-aliased, that'll result in a lower technical score (at least
from me; and you don't have to worry about my vote this round :*) than
if you had only submitted one image.
Jerry
--
http://www.hoboes.com/jerry/
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish, and you've
depleted the lake."--It Isn't Murder If They're Yankees
(http://www.hoboes.com/jerry/Murder/)
Post a reply to this message
|
|