|
 |
On 10 Aug 2004 23:31:40 -0400, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256 com> wrote:
> First of all - povray OUTPUT (not povray program itself). License say that
> one can whatever he wants with it (all images are property of scene file
> creator). Is PovRAY team/users/creators - rather heapy that it can be used
> in serious and/or commercial projects?
Sorry I'm lost what you are trying to say above.
> For example projects like zazzle is totaly based on PovRAY (and other
> rendereres).
Do you know somebody from there and have stats ?
Did you made a simple browsing ? "Wild animals" category. "Travel".
"Astronomy, space." ?
> Second - programs that ARE 3d renderers that need povray and that exist
> almost only for PovRay. There are free projects like TomTree / PovTree.
I'm lost - it's example of what ?
> But also - there is Moray, with is a commercial program with PovRay as
> essentional part.
>
> In fact, Moray also is not distributed along with PovRAY, so I guess they
> had faced same problem as I did, and where forced to same solution (so we
> will just tell them to download it manualy)?
Hint: search for "Moray" in list of POV-Team members in manual.
> Even without such peyment - free (more or less) software grows rapidly.
My observation is exactly opposite: I saw larger frequency of announcement of
good patches/include files/additional tools in the past.
> "stop playing with that and get a real 3d visualization
> C++ library"
What's name of this library ?
> Is blocking usage of PovRay renderer a good thing to do?
Nobody is blocking anything. So many programs have export to POV script - how
is it blocking? Open Office does export to MS Word but it does not need to
distribute MS Word itself.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
