I was just looking through the current competition round and found that

ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/hhcopy.jpg

seems to be made completely with Photoshop.  I don't have the impression
that it is a willful violation of the rules though. The text file does not
mention anything about the creation.

Furthermore i'm a bit in doubt if 

ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/dvmstagn.jpg

was made explicitly for the IRTC, it is a very nice picture, but according
to the text file it was made as "a proposal to renovate a school gymnasium
into a chapel".

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3A9F96C6.BDEA0066@gmx.de...
>
> I was just looking through the current competition round and found that
>
> ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/hhcopy.jpg
>
> seems to be made completely with Photoshop.  I don't have the impression
> that it is a willful violation of the rules though. The text file does not
> mention anything about the creation.

.... and way off-topic IMHO.

>
> Furthermore i'm a bit in doubt if
>
> ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/dvmstagn.jpg
>
> was made explicitly for the IRTC, it is a very nice picture, but according
> to the text file it was made as "a proposal to renovate a school gymnasium
> into a chapel".
>

Hmm, hard to know about this one - if he "refined it" for the irtc then it
is legal (iirc). Should someone contact the author for clarification? It
would seem a shame not to count it - it's a very attractive image.

Post a reply to this message

Tom Melly wrote:
> 
> "Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
> news:3A9F96C6.BDEA0066@gmx.de...
> >
> > I was just looking through the current competition round and found that
> >
> > ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/hhcopy.jpg
> >
> > seems to be made completely with Photoshop.  I don't have the impression
> > that it is a willful violation of the rules though. The text file does not
> > mention anything about the creation.
> 
> .... and way off-topic IMHO.
> 
> >
> > Furthermore i'm a bit in doubt if
> >
> > ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/dvmstagn.jpg
> >
> > was made explicitly for the IRTC, it is a very nice picture, but according
> > to the text file it was made as "a proposal to renovate a school gymnasium
> > into a chapel".
> >
> 
> Hmm, hard to know about this one - if he "refined it" for the irtc then it
> is legal (iirc). Should someone contact the author for clarification? It
> would seem a shame not to count it - it's a very attractive image.

What about ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/sacrfice.jpg

which has a "2000" copyright ?


-- 
Francois Labreque | And a four year old carelessly banging on a toy
    flabreque     | piano is not only 'music', it's probably the last
        @         | moment of 'artistic purity' they'll ever enjoy
   videotron.ca   | before outside influences start corrupting their
                  | expression.    - Chris R.

Post a reply to this message

Francois Labreque wrote:
> 
> What about ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/sacrfice.jpg
> 
> which has a "2000" copyright ?
> 

I didn't notice that yet, but it doesn't necessaryly mean something, i
also sometimes have troubles with the year numbers at the beginning of a
new year ;-)

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

Christoph Hormann wrote:

> Furthermore i'm a bit in doubt if
> 
> ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/dvmstagn.jpg
> 
> was made explicitly for the IRTC, it is a very nice picture, but according
> to the text file it was made as "a proposal to renovate a school gymnasium
> into a chapel".

Well, as long as it has never been shown before, and since it fits the
topic, that's not a big problem.  What disturbs me is the architectural
vocabulary (columns, arches,..) used in the project, but that's another 
story...

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message

Fabien Mosen wrote:
> 
> Well, as long as it has never been shown before, and since it fits the
> topic, that's not a big problem.  What disturbs me is the architectural
> vocabulary (columns, arches,..) used in the project, but that's another
> story...
> 

Well, it's on the submitter's web site that is mentioned in the text file
together with some other views of the same scene, don't know how long it
has been there though.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message