Tom Melly wrote:
> 
> "Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
> news:3A9F96C6.BDEA0066@gmx.de...
> >
> > I was just looking through the current competition round and found that
> >
> > ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/hhcopy.jpg
> >
> > seems to be made completely with Photoshop.  I don't have the impression
> > that it is a willful violation of the rules though. The text file does not
> > mention anything about the creation.
> 
> .... and way off-topic IMHO.
> 
> >
> > Furthermore i'm a bit in doubt if
> >
> > ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/dvmstagn.jpg
> >
> > was made explicitly for the IRTC, it is a very nice picture, but according
> > to the text file it was made as "a proposal to renovate a school gymnasium
> > into a chapel".
> >
> 
> Hmm, hard to know about this one - if he "refined it" for the irtc then it
> is legal (iirc). Should someone contact the author for clarification? It
> would seem a shame not to count it - it's a very attractive image.

What about ftp://ftp.irtc.org/pub/stills/2001-02-28/sacrfice.jpg

which has a "2000" copyright ?


-- 
Francois Labreque | And a four year old carelessly banging on a toy
    flabreque     | piano is not only 'music', it's probably the last
        @         | moment of 'artistic purity' they'll ever enjoy
   videotron.ca   | before outside influences start corrupting their
                  | expression.    - Chris R.

Post a reply to this message