On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:32:25 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:

>IMBJR wrote:
>>>>An interesting idea for sure. Makes one wonder exactly where the
>>>>copyright on the image itself produced lies.
>>>
>>>Obviously the image would be a derivative work of the scene file.
>> 
>> Mmm, reallly? When I posed that question I think the answer I was
>> expecting was almost a "duh, it's obvious - you are still the owner". 
>
>Sorry. I thought you'd know enough about copyright law that you'd 
>understand that the copyright holder owns the copyright on any 
>"derivative work" created from his original work.
>
>Or, to rephrase is, "duh, it's obvious - you are still the owner."

Thought as much. As I said, it's sometimes not obvious from a posting
what is going on in the mind of the poster.

>
>I am not a lawyer.

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message