|
 |
On 11 Jul 2009 03:19:23 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> The clockmaker theory, then?
>
>Something like, yeah, if I understand correctly.
I don't think so. IIRC the watchmaker argument (if that's what you mean) is
faulty. Firstly it needs you to recognise that a watch is an artefact. Secondly
it was created to support a position (God must exist). I could go on but people
better than I have taken it to bits, like an old watch.
Even if it were true why should such a god be worshiped or even honoured?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
