Florian Brucker wrote:
> 
> That's of course very true, and it's obvious that the current structure 
> of the Wiki is not perfect. Keep in mind, though, that the Wiki is 
> comparatively young, so the "final" structure is not clear, yet. Feel 
> free to suggest one or to implement it yourself :) After all, that's 
> what a Wiki is all about.

For most wikis it is good to have a clearly defined 'unit of 
information' it is based on.  This helps to structure the information. 
For example wikipedia has the unit of the article which can be cross 
referenced, put into article groups with an index page etc.  In a link 
collection this unit obviously should be the link (with annotated 
information) which is a comparitively small unit.  With this a link can 
be part of several categories (Blender for example could be in 
'modelers', 'renderers' and 'free tools').

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Landscape of the week:
http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/ (Last updated 24 Jul. 2005)
MegaPOV with mechanics simulation: http://megapov.inetart.net/

Post a reply to this message