On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:20:58 +0100, "scott" <sco### [at] laptopcom> wrote:

>
>No he doesn't have a valid point,

Oh! Yes he does.

> there is a totally logical reason why 
>childporn.info should be blocked. 

Yes I can see that but I don't agree with your logic.

> If you can't see why then I guess there's 
>no point in discussing it further.

But you will though. See below.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message