|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
m1j wrote:
>
> Would not the program features reflect on the language design and
> vice-versus?
No, the only relation that exists here is that a powerful language makes
some higher level program features unnecessary.
>
> Funny I feel the same way but the licensing of interface and scripting
> language seems common in modern software marketing. Example: Sun Java vs.
> MS Java.
This is not about licensing use of a language, this is about MS creating
a different, incompatible language and advertising it under the same,
protected name.
> Two things I was thinking of: one, help the povteam by providing a possible
> source of funds; two, draw some attention to POVRAY and POV SDL by moving
> it towards being a standard.
The idea that you could increase the popularity of a language by
disallowing its use does not require any comment IMO...
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 23 Sep. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |