|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <4060902f@news.povray.org>,
"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5 com> wrote:
> Christopher James Huff wrote:
> > No it's not. Bloat means more to transfer over the network, and it has
> > no advantages over sending binary information.
>
> Bloat also compresses well.
Sure...add a bunch of junk to get a better compression ratio. The binary
format will still be smaller after compression, if you need to compress
it. High compressability isn't really something to strive for...in fact,
it could be a sign that your format contains too much redundancy.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlink net>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tag povray org>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |