In article <pan### [at] gtenet>,
 Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote:

> I haven't figured out what the syntax for going from objects to pure 
> splines would be yet.

If you mean taking an object like a lathe or prism and getting a spline 
from it, I think that is unnecessary. If you can specify the object, you 
can specify the spline and pass it to the object while keeping it for 
later use.

The internal handling of splines could also use some work...I doubt any 
major changes to internal structures would be in any future version 
though. (Disclaimer: This is my personal judgement, not an official 
statement...but everything that has been said indicates that the next 
major update will be POV 4.)

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message