In article <3e59555e@news.povray.org>, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> 
wrote:

>   You can call them "functions for getting information about an object",
> but don't mix up type terminology with this. That would only cause
> confusion.

I'm not using type terminology. I'm categorizing them by use. When I 
look for documentation on a function, I look for it by use, not by 
return type. I don't care what I'm going to use the return for, I care 
what I'm going to use the function with.
IMO, return type is a terrible way to organize things, with very limited 
use.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message