In article <nahpav41nl0hkk6gvto0tkoq0381td0uvp@4ax.com>,
 ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:

> Where I said I mean sum of functions? Where I said I mean any sum ?

It was somewhat implied by your message, though it was too vague to mean 
much of anything.


> For the opinion "Converting arbitrary point sets into meshes or surfaces is a
> difficult task" I replaied that isosurface can be considered as set of points
> where desription of set is a given function. Of course the difficult part is
> finding that function for given set which is another task. I just wanted 
> point out that isosurface can be a tool in mentioned "conversion".

But you implied that knowing the functions would give you some way to 
find the sum...or were you talking about writing a function by hand that 
would give the same shape as the sum? Again, you haven't given a clear 
description of what you mean by using an isosurface for "conversion".

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message