|
 |
In article <38c1165c$1@news.povray.org>, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
> Right, I was thinking of suggesting that we start using p.o.t. for
> that, but why not make a new group?
Hmm, it might be a good idea, if it doesn't end up being redundant
somehow...
> Hmm... first reason, would anyone frequent it if they knew it only
> contained test images?
I think there are some people who would frequent it *because* it only
contained test images. :-)
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
