|
|
In article <38B### [at] netvisionnetil>, Eitan Tal
<eit### [at] netvisionnetil> wrote:
> I am looking for a transformation / CSG that is the opposite of bounded
> / clipped by.
...
> is there a function that does this operation or do I have to use these
> two options?
> does that triple merge bug exists in newer versions?
What "triple merge bug? Can you explain more clearly what you mean?
Also, bounded_by is an optimization feature, not a clipping/CSG feature
like clipped_by or diffference. Your use of it as one might explain your
problems with merge.
And to do the opposite of clipped_by, try using the inverse keyword in
the clipping object.
Sorry I don't have time to go into more detail right now...I have to go
to school. :-(
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|