In article <3924ec5b@news.povray.org>, "Philippe Debar" 
<phi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

> I also think that a logo is much work. It is often better to spend 
> his time furthering a low number of logo/concept to take them as far 
> as one can then spending all his time brain-storming to get as many 
> logo/concept as possible but perfecting none of them. Once again, if 
> one want advice on which logo/concept to develop, one can ask, but I 
> do not think this should be the purpose of the competition.
> 
> I think a limit of 3 to 5 logo/author would be reasonable.
> 
> It should be (imho) the author responsibility to choose the best 
> between his tries, as this is (imho) also part of the design process.

I really think the author should decide how many he is capable of. And 
his idea of his best logos might be unpopular(see my version of the eye 
logo as an example. :-) ), or the majority of people could favor one 
that he discarded.

However, dozens of minor variations of the same logo are another matter.

-- 
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message