In article <38CC8493.A5135501@ij.net>, Matt Giwer <jul### [at] ijnet> 
wrote:

> 	I mean implementation differences. On an i++ while you can get a
> debate started among purists as to while i < 5 should bail out or
> 4 or 5 in that should the < be checked before or after evaluating
> and changing the variables in the loop. 

Implementation differences between POV and what? There is still only one 
parser currently available.
And we are talking about for loops, not the ++ operator. The ++ operator 
is well defined, no reason for debate over it, and most likely couldn't 
be applied to POV syntax without completely redesigning the variable 
syntax.
A #for(;;) loop is also well defined and quite possible with POV syntax.


> 	You can get another debate on permitting i to be both integer
> and float. 

Huh...what? POV doesn't have integer types, everything is a floating 
point number. And how would this be a debate?

-- 
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/

Post a reply to this message