In article <399### [at] hotmailremovethisbitcom>, Richard Morton 
<ric### [at] hotmailremovethisbitcom> wrote:

> It's more like the paintbrush than the paint but the principle does 
> seem ridiculous when put that way, e.g. would you buy a wrench that 
> came with a tag that said it was OK for personal use but if you used 
> it to build a car, then you couldn't ever sell the car.

I think it is more like being freely given a paintbrush which is a 
commercial product, but only being allowed to sell work done with the 
paintbrush if you buy it. It is perfectly reasonable, just seems a bit 
odd at first. Most companies just require everyone to pay...
At least, this is how I understand the license. I can't even try out the 
program, so I haven't really looked at it.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: e-mail chr### [at] maccom, Web page http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: e-mail chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, Web page http://tag.povray.org/

><>

Post a reply to this message