|
|
In article <3d9a074c@news.povray.org>, "Simon Adameit" <gom### [at] gmxde>
wrote:
> I dont understand why it would still "recurse" after one select() did not
> pick the next select() but for example 0.
Eh, right. That code is still there, just most of the work is done at
parse time, and not all of it will execute. And there is a lot more code
than the equivalent recursive function, it could probably go above the
limit pretty easily.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|