In article <3a5adc40$1@news.povray.org>, "Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba" 
<abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:

> > You're a little late...Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba
> 
> simpler is write just ABX :-)

I often copy-paste my own name... :-)


> I have changed my previous syntax for simpler usage I think
> 
> instead next object in pov syntax I have putted deform into object 
> modifiers

This does look like a better syntax. If your technique allowed warps to 
be used as deformations, it would be perfect...maybe a compromise would 
be a "deform" warp, but there will be a lot of duplication, since people 
will want deforms that do the same things as many of the warps.
Is your technique still limited to deformations that can be "reversed"?

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message