In article <39A### [at] schunteretctu-bsde>, 
chr### [at] gmxde wrote:

> I'm not sure if i understand what you mean, but this would probably 
> not help, the spline is meant for defining the shape of the plank, so 
> the only way that would work would be using a radial pattern and 
> giving the spline in polar coordinates.

Sorry, I read "...proximity pattern would probably be quite slow. I just 
thought it would be nice if you could define the shape with a linear
spline." as defining the shape of the *function* with a linear spline. I 
understand what you mean now, but I don't see an easy way to do it...and 
prisms will probably be one of the objects which have to use the old 
proximity calculation.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message