In article <7cu9ns0dssbmpu17rrsckvgao7t3olfkgg@4ax.com>, Alan Kong 
<ako### [at] povrayNO-SPAMorg> wrote:

> >Still, it is newer than my (incomplete) set of Encyclopedia Britannica, 
> >which is from 1959.
> 
>   Try to hold on to that Britannica set. It will be quite a novelty
> someday, when people will marvel at an encyclopedia that isn't on some
> sort of magnetic or optical storage medium <s>. It's more interesting to
> see what *isn't* contained within the text, as technology has yielded a
> heckuva lot of changes since 1959.

Try to look up anything to do with "computers", for example...

-- 
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] maccom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message