In article <Xns### [at] 204213191226>,
 "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <raf### [at] raf256com> wrote:

> Abd I would also love to see blob path included (smoother version)

The word is "patch", not "path".
And I think you misunderstood those discussions...the blob patches were 
fixes of bugs, the smooth "blobs" were isosurface functions that 
theoretically could be written into the blob code, but not easily. A 
different blob primitive is a possibility, it is one of my projects, but 
doesn't exist yet.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message